my evolving take on A2A is that the world isn't ready, and i'm not sure it ever will be
A2A visualizes agent-to-agent comms similar to actors. messages pass between the agents and can be interleaved and out-of-order and don't have to be simple request->response. an agent can be spontaneously msg'd
my evolving take on A2A is that the world isn't ready, and i'm not sure it ev...
View original thread
21
the thing is, almost all AI tooling has been oriented around functions — parameters go in, return values go out
its easy to understand and has broad support
its easy to understand and has broad support
3
there's a few frameworks, like autogen, where chatter between agents is a little bit free-form, but even those have rules, and they take a monolithic approach involving specific comms patterns
i don't think this is a good sign for interop
i don't think this is a good sign for interop
3
is A2A a good protocol?
it's clean, small and simple. it's good from that perspective. but actor-based comms patterns historically have not worked terribly well
e.g. Akka eventually developed a Future-based API
i see MCP being used and abused rather than adopt A2A
it's clean, small and simple. it's good from that perspective. but actor-based comms patterns historically have not worked terribly well
e.g. Akka eventually developed a Future-based API
i see MCP being used and abused rather than adopt A2A
4